1986 Peugeot 205 vs. 1972 Volvo 140
To start off, 1986 Peugeot 205 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Peugeot 205 (444 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 140. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 205 should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 140 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1986 Peugeot 205.
Because 1986 Peugeot 205 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Volvo 140. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 205 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Peugeot 205 (501 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 140. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Peugeot 205 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Peugeot 205 | 1972 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 205 | 140 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1775 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 501 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |