1986 Peugeot 205 vs. 2012 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Peugeot 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Peugeot 205 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1986 Peugeot 205. (85 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1986 Peugeot 205.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Compass (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Peugeot 205. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Peugeot 205.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Peugeot 205 | 2012 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
| Model | 205 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1359 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 223 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1814 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1651 mm |
