1986 Peugeot 504 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Peugeot 504. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Peugeot 504 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Peugeot 504 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Peugeot 504 (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 504 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Peugeot 504 weights approximately 186 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Peugeot 504 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Peugeot 504. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Peugeot 504 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 504 | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |