1986 Peugeot Proxima vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Peugeot Proxima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Peugeot Proxima would be higher. At 2,850 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Peugeot Proxima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1986 Peugeot Proxima. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1986 Peugeot Proxima.
Because 1986 Peugeot Proxima is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot Proxima will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Peugeot Proxima. (122 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Peugeot Proxima.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Peugeot Proxima | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Peugeot | Renault |
| Model | Proxima | Megane |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2850 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1470 mm |
