1986 Plymouth Caravelle vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Caravelle. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Civic weights approximately 155 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (174 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Plymouth Caravelle. (158 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Plymouth Caravelle | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Plymouth | Honda |
Model | Caravelle | Civic |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 174 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |