1986 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 858 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Nissan Pathfinder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Plymouth Reliant | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Plymouth | Nissan |
| Model | Reliant | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 2008 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4884 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2850 mm |
