1986 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2009 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2009 Panoz Esperante is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Panoz Esperante (305 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Panoz Esperante should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Panoz Esperante weights approximately 360 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Panoz Esperante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Panoz Esperante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Plymouth Sundance | 2009 Panoz Esperante | |
| Make | Plymouth | Panoz |
| Model | Sundance | Esperante |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 4589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
