1986 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1381 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Plymouth Sundance | 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | Plymouth | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sundance | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 2556 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2007 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2946 mm |
