1986 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 778 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Plymouth Sundance | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Plymouth | Cadillac |
| Model | Sundance | CTS |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |
