1986 Plymouth Voyager vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Plymouth Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Plymouth Voyager | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Plymouth | Nissan |
| Model | Voyager | Navara |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3210 mm |
