1986 Plymouth Voyager vs. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 100 kg more than 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Plymouth Voyager | 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | Plymouth | SSC |
| Model | Voyager | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1269 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1090 mm |
