1986 Renault 18 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1986 Renault 18 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Renault 18 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Renault 18 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1986 Renault 18.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Renault 18 (163 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Renault 18 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Renault 18 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | 18 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |