1986 Renault 18 vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1986 Renault 18 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Camry (106 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1986 Renault 18. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 18. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Renault 18 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Camry (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 18. (163 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Renault 18 | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 18 | Camry |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |