1986 Renault 21 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 21 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1986 Renault 21. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 21.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Renault 21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 21. (72 Nm). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Renault 21 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 21 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 45 L |
