1986 Renault 21 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 21 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1986 Renault 21. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 413 kg more than 1986 Renault 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (228 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 21. (72 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 21.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Renault 21 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | 21 | 3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 72 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 60 L |