1986 Renault Rodeo vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1986 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault Rodeo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault Rodeo. (76 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Renault Rodeo | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Rodeo | E-350 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 76 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 57 L |