1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Audi |
Model | Corniche | TT |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2469 mm |