1986 Rover 825 vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Rover 825 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (159 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Rover 825 weights approximately 36 kg more than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Rover 825 (268 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Camry. (220 Nm). This means 1986 Rover 825 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Rover 825 | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 825 | Camry |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 268 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |