1986 Rover 825 vs. 2008 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Korando is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Rover 825 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 SsangYong Korando (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 364 kg more than 1986 Rover 825. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Rover 825. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Rover 825 (268 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 SsangYong Korando. (213 Nm @ 2860 RPM). This means 1986 Rover 825 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 SsangYong Korando.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Rover 825 | 2008 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Rover | SsangYong |
| Model | 825 | Korando |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 268 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2860 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 11.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |
