1986 Seat Ronda vs. 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1986 Seat Ronda is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,777 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 400 kg more than 1986 Seat Ronda.
Because 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Seat Ronda | 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Seat | Studebaker |
| Model | Ronda | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1957 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1193 cc | 2777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2980 mm |
