1986 Skoda Rapid R vs. 1971 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1986 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Skoda Rapid R (62 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Skoda Rapid R should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1986 Skoda Rapid R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Skoda Rapid R (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Skoda Rapid R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Skoda Rapid R | 1971 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Skoda | Zastava |
| Model | Rapid R | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2850 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |
