1986 Subaru XT vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Subaru XT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Subaru XT would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1986 Subaru XT. (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Subaru XT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 579 kg more than 1986 Subaru XT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Subaru XT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Subaru XT. (211 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Subaru XT. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1986 Subaru XT has manual transmission. 1986 Subaru XT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Subaru XT | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Subaru | Cadillac |
Model | XT | CTS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2672 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.3 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1278 kg | 1857 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |