1986 Subaru XT vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Subaru XT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Subaru XT would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1986 Subaru XT. (147 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1986 Subaru XT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 649 kg more than 1986 Subaru XT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Subaru XT. (211 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Subaru XT. 2013 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1986 Subaru XT has manual transmission. 1986 Subaru XT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Subaru XT 2013 Mazda CX-9
Make Subaru Mazda
Model XT CX-9
Year Released 1986 2013
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2672 cc 3726 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type boxer V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 147 HP 269 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 211 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 67 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.3:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1278 kg 1927 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 5108 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1936 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1728 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2875 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]