1986 Suzuki Swift vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Suzuki Swift. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Suzuki Swift | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Suzuki | Ford |
| Model | Swift | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
