1986 Toyota Camry vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Toyota Camry (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 55 kg more than 1986 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (300 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Toyota Camry. (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Toyota Camry | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Camry | C-Max |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2648 mm |