1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2002 Kia Sephia II
To start off, 2002 Kia Sephia II is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Kia Sephia II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 49 kg more than 2002 Kia Sephia II.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Sephia II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Kia Sephia II has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Kia Sephia II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2002 Kia Sephia II | |
| Make | Toyota | Kia |
| Model | Lite Ace | Sephia II |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |
