1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2004 Volvo S80
To start off, 2004 Volvo S80 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S80 weights approximately 426 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2004 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Lite Ace | S80 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2401 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1440 mm |
