1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 226 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Lite Ace | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 3954 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 236 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
