1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 770 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Toyota | Dodge |
| Model | Lite Ace | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 6100 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 425 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1874 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1923 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
