1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Peugeot 408 has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Peugeot 408 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Toyota | Peugeot |
Model | Lite Ace | 408 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1560 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1525 mm |