1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2011 Mazda 6
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 6 weights approximately 446 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2011 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Toyota | Mazda |
| Model | Lite Ace | 6 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2183 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1795 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1440 mm |
