1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 58 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Toyota | Mazda |
| Model | Lite Ace | 2 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1500 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1475 mm |
