1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 541 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Lite Ace | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 5000 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1412 mm |