1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 384 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | Lite Ace | CX-5 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |