1986 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 431 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Lite Ace | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 166 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1680 mm |
