1986 Zastava Yugo vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Zastava Yugo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Zastava Yugo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1986 Zastava Yugo. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1986 Zastava Yugo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Zastava Yugo. (77 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Zastava Yugo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Zastava Yugo | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Zastava | Holden |
Model | Yugo | Epica |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 77 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2700 mm |