1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. (123 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 164 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3210 mm |
