1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (175 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 406 kg more than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Hudson |
| Model | 164 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3160 mm |
