1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 775 kg more than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 164 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
