1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 777 kg more than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 164 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2050 mm |
