1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (192 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 39 kg more than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 164 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2960 mm |
