1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (192 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (245 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
Model | 164 | 102 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2160 mm |