1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 279 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. (245 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | 164 | Ram |
Year Released | 1987 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3020 mm |