1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. (192 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (245 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 164 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |
