1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. (123 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1987 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (294 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 164 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2580 mm |