1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2006 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (294 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
Model | 164 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.8 seconds | 13.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.7 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 90 L |