1987 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 1,962 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1987 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 164 | Clio |
Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |