1987 Alfa Romeo 75 vs. 2006 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 2006 Mercury Monterey is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Alfa Romeo 75 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Monterey (201 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. (95 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Monterey should accelerate faster than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 790 kg more than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercury Monterey is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Monterey will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Monterey (357 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. (192 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Mercury Monterey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Alfa Romeo 75 | 2006 Mercury Monterey | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | 75 | Monterey |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 97.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 98 L |