1987 Alfa Romeo 75 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Alfa Romeo 75 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-5 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. (95 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5 should accelerate faster than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 268 kg more than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1987 Alfa Romeo 75 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-5 (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. (192 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Alfa Romeo 75. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 1987 Alfa Romeo 75 has manual transmission. 1987 Alfa Romeo 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Alfa Romeo 75 | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 75 | CX-5 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.9 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 56 L |