1987 Audi 80 vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1987 Audi 80 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Audi 80 (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 12 kg more than 1987 Audi 80.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Audi 80. (120 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Audi 80 | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 80 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |